Building Your Defence Against a Revenge Porn Allegation

Our solicitors begin by examining how the allegation arose and what evidence the police and prosecution are relying on. This includes reviewing digital communications, identifying who had access to the devices involved and assessing whether the material meets the legal definition of a private sexual photograph or film under the law.

We then challenge the prosecution’s case at every stage. Our solicitors examine the status of the images, the question of consent, who actually disclosed the material, and whether the prosecution can prove the required intent to cause distress.

Tyler Hoffman’s solicitors act immediately at the pre-charge stage, engaging with the police and Crown Prosecution Service and making robust legal representations about the strength of the evidence. In some cases, this can lead to charges being dropped before reaching court.

If the case proceeds to court, our solicitors build a defence strategy grounded in meticulous analysis of the digital evidence and the full circumstances of the allegation. We challenge the prosecution’s case wherever it falls short, press every available legal argument and present the strongest possible case in your favour. Through decisive advocacy, we work to dismantle weak allegations, reduce the charges where possible and make sure that your side of the story is fully understood in court.

Where the evidence is overwhelming and sentencing cannot be avoided, we will work to mitigate your position, reduce the charges presented to court, and secure a favourable outcome in the circumstances.

What Is the Legal Definition of Revenge Porn?

For a revenge porn charge to succeed, the prosecution must prove several specific elements of the offence. These are legal thresholds that must be satisfied before a conviction is possible, which means that if an investigation does not show that the thresholds are met, charges may be dropped.
In most cases, prosecutors must establish that:

• The image or film was private.
• The material was sexual in nature.
• The accused person disclosed the image to another person.
• The disclosure occurred without the consent of the person depicted.
• The disclosure was made with the required intent, which in many cases means an intention to cause distress.

If the prosecution cannot prove each of these elements, the case should not succeed.

In practice, many revenge porn investigations hinge on questions about the nature of the material, the circumstances in which it was shared and the intent behind that disclosure. These issues often emerge through detailed examination of digital evidence, including messages, social media activity and communication records.

For defence solicitors, this is where cases are won or lost. Careful analysis of the evidence can expose gaps in the prosecution’s case, challenge assumptions about how the material was shared and test whether the legal requirements of the offence can truly be met.

How the Police Investigate Revenge Porn Allegations

Investigations into alleged revenge porn offences are heavily evidence-driven. Police will typically focus on digital material and communication records in an attempt to establish how images were stored, accessed and shared.
Officers commonly examine:

• Mobile phones and tablets
• Laptops and other electronic devices
• Social media accounts
• Messaging applications
• Cloud storage accounts
• Communication records and screenshots
• Witness statements

In many cases, devices are seized and subjected to forensic analysis. Investigators will attempt to establish when images were created, where they were stored and whether they were distributed from a particular device or account.

While screenshots or recovered images may appear straightforward, the reality is often more complex. Messages, timestamps, metadata and the broader context of communications can significantly alter how the evidence is interpreted.

Experienced defence solicitors approach this evidence carefully. At Tyler Hoffman, our team examines how the material was obtained, how it has been analysed and whether the conclusions drawn by investigators accurately reflect what actually happened. In cases involving digital evidence, these details often make the difference between allegation and proof, and can determine whether a case proceeds to charge or falls apart under scrutiny.

What Are the Penalties for Revenge Porn Offences?

Revenge porn offences are treated seriously by the courts in England and Wales. The offence of disclosing private sexual photographs or films without consent, and with the intention of causing distress, carries a maximum sentence of up to two years’ imprisonment.
Depending on the circumstances of the case, the court may impose:

• A custodial sentence
• A suspended prison sentence
• A community order
• A restraining order restricting contact or communication
• An unlimited fine
• A permanent criminal record

When determining the appropriate sentence, the court will consider factors such as the nature of the images involved, the scale of distribution, the level of distress said to have been caused and whether aggravating features are present. These may include harassment, abuse of trust, repeated disclosure of images or deliberate attempts to damage the complainant’s reputation.

A conviction can also carry wider consequences beyond the sentence itself. Criminal records of this nature can affect employment opportunities, professional licensing, relationships and reputation.

For these reasons, we strongly advise contacting our team as soon as you become aware that you may be facing allegations of this nature. The earlier we are involved, the more opportunity we have to intervene in the investigation, challenge the evidence being relied upon and influence how the case develops.

Services in this section

FAQs About Revenge Porn Offences

What counts as revenge porn under English law?

In England and Wales, the offence commonly referred to as revenge porn arises where a person discloses a private photograph or film of a sexual nature without the consent of the individual depicted, and with the intention of causing that person distress. The offence is set out in section 33 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015.

For the offence to be made out, the prosecution must prove several key elements. First, the image or video must qualify as both private and sexual in nature. A photograph or film is considered private if it shows something that would not ordinarily be seen in public. It is considered sexual if it depicts sexual activity, an individual’s exposed genitals, or material that a reasonable person would regard as sexual.

Secondly, the prosecution must show that the accused disclosed the material to another person. Disclosure can include sending images directly to someone else, sharing them through messaging platforms, posting them on social media or distributing them more widely online.

Finally, it must be proven that the disclosure occurred without the consent of the person depicted and that it was done with the intention of causing distress. Without evidence of this intent, the offence may not be established.

These cases often turn on the surrounding circumstances, including how the images were obtained, the context in which they were shared and the digital evidence available to investigators.

What if the person originally sent the image to me?

In some cases, images are initially shared consensually within a relationship. However, sharing the same material with others later may still lead to criminal allegations if it was done without consent and meets the legal criteria for the offence.

From a defence perspective, the surrounding circumstances become highly relevant. This can include how the image was originally shared, what was said in accompanying messages, the nature of the relationship between the parties and the context in which the material was later disclosed.

Our defence solicitors will also examine whether the prosecution can actually prove the required intent to cause distress, whether the image legally qualifies as private and sexual under the legislation, and whether the accused person was responsible for the alleged disclosure.

Will the police take my phone or other electronic devices?

In many revenge porn investigations, police will seize electronic devices for forensic examination. This commonly includes mobile phones, tablets and computers, but investigators may also seek access to social media accounts, cloud storage or other devices linked to the allegation. In some cases, this may include work devices if they are believed to have been used to store or share the material.

Specialist digital forensics teams will review messages, images, videos and communication records to establish how the material was created, stored or disclosed. Devices are often retained for several weeks or months while this analysis is carried out. A defence solicitor can advise on your rights during this process and scrutinise how digital evidence has been obtained and interpreted.

Can I still be charged if the image was only shared once?

The law does not necessarily require widespread distribution. A single disclosure of a private sexual photograph or film without consent may be enough to lead to criminal charges, depending on the circumstances.

What should I do if I am accused of revenge porn?

If you are accused of sharing intimate images, seek legal advice as soon as possible from a solicitor who specialises in defending against allegations of sexual offences. The team at Tyler Hoffman is available 24/7 to discuss your situation. Do not discuss the allegation with anyone other than your solicitor and avoid contacting the person involved, as any communication may later form part of the evidence.

You should also avoid deleting messages, images or social media content connected to the allegation. Police investigations into image-based offences typically involve detailed digital forensic analysis of phones, computers and online accounts. Even where material has been deleted, investigators may still recover messages, images and account activity through specialist software. Attempting to remove or alter evidence after an allegation has been made can complicate matters and may be viewed negatively during an investigation.

A solicitor at Tyler Hoffman can advise you on your rights before any police interview, explain how the law applies to the allegations you are facing and assess the evidence investigators may rely on. Our team can represent you during police questioning, review digital material obtained by the police and begin preparing your defence from the earliest stage of the investigation. Early legal advice allows us to protect your position immediately and guide you through the steps that follow in a police enquiry.